Civil rights in philosophy

Civil rights in philosophical system essay 10 BY BillBBowers Fighting For Rights and equitableice Civil disobedience Summary With Mills argument for a limited or possibility for no government and then Hobbes view that society and men where narcissistic and needed a sovereign offer to get along, brings us to the endure of Henry David Thoreau. Thoreau is famous for his isolation of society and his work Walden, he seen this approach of no government and sees selfish man kind to, so his is an mixed theory.Thoreau k impudent that living in ociety was strategic, but didnt think that the government should have such a say into ones personal life. Thoreau writes, must(prenominal) the citizen ever for a moment, or in the last degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience, then? He thought that the Just laws and government should be more important, similar to the same concepts ofa later famous philosopher, Martin Luther King. King took this same thought process when he protested and fought for rights and Justice in a civil disobedience focus ObjectionsMills argument for a limited government doest seem that intelligible or reliable to me I personally dont think that would work at all. I would agree more with Hobbess view that men argon selfish and need some kind of sovereignty for an overall peaceful environment. However, a someone mix between the two like Thoreau tried to do would be beneficial, but I dont see mankind willing to change and accepts bare-ass ways of government, especially not one so extreme. Its a good concept, but like most say, you cant teach a old dog new tricksDefinition Philosophy is a such a broad and complex field that its offended hard to give a basic, simple definition. In a quick course, weve learned that Philosophy deals with subjects like religion, knowledge, reality, self, mind, body, freedom, ethics, and Justice. Each subject builds on top of the other, from religion we get our beliefs about how we go t here and why. Which moves to our knowledge of why we learn, our brains and the way we learn over processes. Then we go into our reality in which we touch ack on knowledge and religion of what we really know and can prove, and why we are here.This moves back into a broad subject of the self, like who we really are why we think and learn different and our mind-body controversies. Fromm there we learn that our freedom is important and move into modern philosophy problems like ethics and, recently read, Justice. These are modern problems of how we rule, whats affective, whats not, how people want to be treated and ruled. These are important to philosophy as a while because we cant really say what the right answer is.